{"id":3191,"date":"2017-08-09T13:53:09","date_gmt":"2017-08-09T17:53:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/oook.info\/blog\/?p=3191"},"modified":"2017-08-09T13:53:09","modified_gmt":"2017-08-09T17:53:09","slug":"compositae","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/oook.info\/blog\/?p=3191","title":{"rendered":"compositae"},"content":{"rendered":"

I have in the past harbored reservations about composite photographs, thinking them somehow impure. That stance began to weaken when I really looked<\/i> at Jerry Uelsmann’s work<\/a>, and in recent years has fallen away almost completely. A visit (last weekend) to John Paul Caponigro’s annual Open Studio was especially heartening (see his Revelation series<\/a>), though John Paul’s mastery of technique is daunting.<\/p>\n

\nMy own composite images have mostly been symmetrical mirrorings, which I’m pleased to think of as tessellations<\/b>, though most of them are 2x and 4x and don’t really amount to multi-unit tiling, though some of the work with Betsy’s images realizes that potential:
\n


\n\"First<\/a>