Hugh Blackmer
Washington & Lee University
November 2001
These are all issues of Information Fluency, and address the full gamut of concerns of the ACS Initiative: end users must develop research skills across a growing range of information media, institutions must build collections to support the evolving needs of teaching and learning, and library and computing staff must create the infrastructure for delivery of effective and timely logistical support and training. While the primary goal of an Information Fluency Initiative on a campus is to support the needs of local departments and programs, ACS objectives also include (1) encouraging implementation of 'best practises' on other campuses, (2) developing collaborations among ACS members, and (3) sharing resources and facilitating exchanges where feasible. This proposal addresses all of these goals and purposes, and seeks support for creation of a prototype of management software which will enable development of spatial data libraries on ACS campuses.
At the Richmond meeting we discovered that Sewanee and Washington & Lee have been pursuing complementary approaches to GIS development:
The Landscape Analysis Lab at Sewanee (under the direction of Jon Evans) combines a focused and externally funded research program with a GIS teaching environment. Support personnel have practical knowledge of a broad spectrum of GIS products and have learned a great deal about data management and solving day-to-day problems. Summer workshops have built basic skills and established an effective training model.Much can be gained from linkage of these efforts, and this proposal seeks funding for travel for working visits of 3-4 days, to facilitate exchange between campuses.At Washington & Lee a collaboration between a librarian (Hugh Blackmer), the Director of the Media Center (John Blackburn), and a database and networking specialist (Skip Williams) has focused on Internet Map Server (ArcIMS) development, centered on Web-based map interfaces to interconnected data realms (image archives, bibliographic records), distribution of interactive maps to classroom and community, and support for campus internationalization. This effort also draws on the skills of senior Computer Science students, whose capstone projects can be linked to the development effort.
Ultimately we seek to build a distributable spatial library, including data, management tools, and supporting documentation which can be brought to a campus information environment (computing facilities and library) and integrated with existing systems, personnel, and curricular objectives. The Richmond meeting (under the leadership of Pat Schoknecht) recognized that creation of components of this spatial library will be a multi-stage effort, for which external funding will be sought. In the interim, and to support development of the grant proposal, we at Washington & Lee propose to continue to work on prototypes of system modules, in consultation with people from several ACS schools. Site visits will broaden our knowledge of existing resources, complementary skills, and specific problems, and will establish the basis for future collaboration with GIS users on several campuses (initially, Davidson, Furman and Richmond, in addition to Sewanee; others interested in participation could be added).
Some spatial data are needed by all institutions (such as global and national base maps and census data), but most campuses also require local data in various formats (topographic maps, TIGER files, remote sensing imagery), and researchers need to store and distribute project-specific data. End users must often wrestle with unfamiliar data formats, projections, and conversion software.
GIS has appeared on ACS campuses in some departments (Geology at Trinity, Centenary and Washington & Lee; Biology at Davidson; Anthropology at Centre; Politics at Washington & Lee) and programs (Environmental Studies at Rhodes, Furman and Sewanee), but spread to other settings awaits improved support for users. Few ACS institutions are likely to fund GIS support personnel until their absolute necessity is clear, libraries are unprepared to take on management and distribution of spatial data, and few faculty will invest time and energy in learning and using GIS without institutional support. Breaking this logjam requires an innovative model of support and distribution.
While the present proposal covers only prototype development during the next 6-8 months, a more detailed sketch of our developing vision for the fuller system will clarify the directions we contemplate. Refinements and elaboration (which will feed into the application for external funding) will come both from discussions we have with other ACS participants and from convergent developments in the GIS industry.
We seek to build a spatial information infrastructure that (1) end users can navigate easily, (2) librarians can use and maintain without special skills, (3) faculty can draw upon to augment and distribute course material, (4) institutions can build upon for outreach to surrounding communities, (5) will support the work of GIS support staff as institutions add them, and (6) will stimulate collaborations among ACS partners. The elements include:
Subsequent developments may include
GRAND TOTAL: $2800
Some documents that summarize my thinking and activities at specific
times:
GIS in midsummer 2001 (a general summary, including a report of my attendance at ESRI's User Conference)What we need to do in planning and carrying out the next phase of GIS development (end of June 2001)
Some resources for University of Richmond visit, 25 May 2001
Building a Digital Library of Spatial Data and Images for Rockbridge County (April 2001)GIS in Undergraduate Teaching (Dec 2000 summary)
GIS Across the Curriculum (LAAP PreProposal, March 2000)
GIS: an insurmountable opportunity? (November 1999)
Information Fluency writings, 1999-2001