Howard Odum

We tend to think of the tools we've been talking about in terms of their use in narrowing research interests. It's really important to realize that they can be used in the other direction as well, as means to approach wider problems. This week's guest speaker makes a wonderful example: Howard T. Odum has maverick status in several fields (that is, he's admired by some and vilified by others) for his activities as a generalist, presuming to address BIG questions and to cross disciplinary boundaries. I encountered Odum in the early 1970s, when I was doing my dissertation research on North American agricultural systems. His Environment, Power and Society [1971] provided a way to conceptualize pathways and measure flows of energy in systems, and to recognize energy organization as an essential element in the information systems which animate regions.

Odum offers the vision and the means to consider ecology at any scale --to look at the grand ('systems ecology') as well as the minuscule, and to appreciate the essentially dynamic nature (his current term is 'pulsing') of ecological systems.

So what should we DO to comprehend Odum? What could we attempt? Following are some paths I've explored, and it's worth thinking about what search strategies make sense. This is a case in point for the utility of the approaches and tools we've been looking at.

An Annie search for ODUM, HT produces 6 books at W&L.
The web is a good place to look for threads and ways to get started in comprehending what Odum is all about and what he's connected to, and AltaVista is my tool of choice for searching:

"Howard T. Odum": AltaVista 83

One doesn't need to read far to find the distinctive word Emergy: AltaVista 834

Emergy "is the available energy of one kind previously used up directly and indirectly to make a service or product" (Odum 1996:7)

Some representative links:

Energy, Entropy, Economics and Ecology (http://www.aloha.net/~jhanson/page17.htm)

"Solar emergy is the solar energy availability used up directly and indirectly to make a service or product. Its unit is the solar emjoule.

"Solar transformity is the solar emergy required to make one joule of a service or product. Its unit is solar emjoules per joule. " [p.p. 201-203]

(see also http://www.aloha.net/~jhanson/page1.htm)

Complex Ecology: Network Properties In Ecosystems (http://www.pz-oekosys.uni-kiel.de/~maren-l/abstract/abs_a12.htm) [Patten & Fath --happens to mention a 1981 article with an interesting title and this trenchant passage:]

Many ecologists prefer not to think about ecosystems at all. For them, the theory of ecology is complete with the organism and its evolving population. Organisms feed upon and compete with one another in an environment which is unnecessary to define beyond 'carrying capacity.' Out of such direct interactions with immediate neighbors derives the natural selection of chance genetic variations that constitutes evolution. The successful organism, best adapted over all alternatives to that which remains unspecified, maximizes the frequency of its genotype within the populations of its species. The theory is pat, and environment is always there, prepared and ready to accomodate another cycle of the process. For us, we must ask how it is that environment is always prepared and ready; why did it not become chaotic long ago, a disorganized heap of unprocessed and partially processed energy-matter residues from the evolutionary biology of past ages? The theory of ecology is not pat for us. We believe that to understand the organism in nature, its other half, environment, will have to be understood as well. To us, "environment" means environment unspecified, but "ecosystem" is environment specified. The ecosystem is the level of organization concerned with the orderly, not chaotic, processing of energy-matter in the biosphere. We do not believe that it is the goal of ecosystems to do this. They are not superorganisms. Rather, it is a constraint of existence that if living processes are not orderly, antientropic, then they will not persist. The balance of nature calls for a conjugate action-reaction kind of organization that creates order where there could be chaos as a matter of implicit design that simply evolved over geologic time.
Patten, Bernard C. and Howard T. Odum
The cybernetic nature of ecosystems.
American Naturalist (1981) 118:886-895

My own interest in Odum grew out of reading I had done in general system theory and my struggles to comprehend agricultural production systems and their trajectories. Here are two items which summarize nicely:

Agroecosystem Characteristics

Agricultural ecosystems (referred to as agroecosystems) have been described by Odum (1984) as domesticated ecosystems. He states that they are in many ways intermediate between natural ecosystems (such as grasslands and forests) and fabricated ecosystems (cities).

Agroecosystems are solar powered (as are natural systems) but differ from natural systems in that:

  1. there are auxiliary energy sources that are used to enhance productivity; these sources are processed fuels along with animal and human labor;
  2. species diversity is reduced by human management in order to maximize yield of specific foodstuffs (plant or animal);
  3. dominant plant and animal species are under artificial rather than natural selection; and,
  4. control is external and goal-oriented rather than internal via subsystem feedback as in natural ecosystems.

Agroecosystems do not happen without human intervention in the landscape. Therefore, creation of these ecosystems (and maintenance of them as well) is necessarily concerned with the (human) economic goals of production, productivity, and conservation. Agroecosystems are controlled, by definition, by management of ecological processes.

(http://www.nhq.nrcs.usda.gov/BCS/agecol/agecodef.html)

'Potatoes Made of Oil': Eugene and Howard Odum and the Origins and Limits of American Agroecology

Mark Glen Madison

Environment and History 3(1997): 209-238

Eugene P. Odum (b. 1913) and Howard T. Odum (b.1924) were at the forefront of the 'new ecology' of ecosystems, in the 1950s and 1960s. As part of their programme the Odums were firmly committed to bringing both natural and human ecosystems into accord with the laws of ecoenergetics (the flow of energy through a system). American agriculture struck the Odums as a particularly egregious violator of all the laws of ecoenergetics and hence a dangerous paradigm for world development. By diagramming American agriculture as a simplified circuit of energy inputs and outputs, the Odums concluded that energy subsidies had created a dangerously unstable system. As a remedy they suggested an end to the Green Revolution and a modification of human society so as to better approach the steady-state of a mature natural ecosystem. To achieve their programme goals the Odums needed to enlist the support of their fellow ecologists and the government. In this attempt the Odums were largely unsuccessful, as the ecological community and the US government largely ignored their attempt to reform agriculture. While the Odums' agroecological language and theories have persisted until the present, they have largely been divested of the brothers' broader programme of bringing the entire human ecosystem into accord with natural laws. By re-examining the social and scientific context of the Odums' early agroecology it may be possible to better evaluate agroecology as both a tool and a social programme.

(http://www.erica.demon.co.uk/EH310.html)


It's interesting to me that anthropologists have been especially attracted to Odum's perspective:
Complex Adaptive Systems, Evolutionism, and Ecology within Anthropology:Interdisciplinary Research for Understanding Cultural and Ecological Dynamics (Tom Abe l)
I did some searching in ISI's Web of Science and followed up on a 1988 article in Science which had been cited by 59 subsequent writers. An examination of the citers made an interesting exercise: many were in a journal called Ecological Modelling which we don't have; Ecological Economics and Ecological Engineering also appear pretty frequently.
I did an AGRICOLA search for Odum, HT and Odum, Howard, figuring that his environmental work might show up there.
I did a HOLLIS search for au odum howard, reasoning that Harvard's catalog would probably have things that few others had.
Odum is an example of someone who can make us see things differently and even question assumptions. Such people rescue us from mundane ruts (and it's important to recognize that normal science is pretty much mundane ruts...). Here's a record from a Cambridge Scientific Abstracts search:
TI: Title
Nature's pulsing paradigm
AU: Author
Odum, WE; Odum, EP*; Odum, HT
AF: Author Affiliation
Inst. Ecol., Univ. Georgia, Athens, GA 30601, USA
CF: Conference
Pulsed Ecosystems: A New Paradigm?, Hilton Head, SC (USA), Nov 1993
ED: Editor
Blum, LK (ed)
SO: Source
PULSED ECOSYSTEMS: A NEW PARADIGM? PROCEEDINGS OF A SYMPOSIUM HELD IN HILTON HEAD, NOVEMBER 1993., 1995, pp. 547-555, ESTUARIES, vol. 18, no. 4
IS: ISSN
0160-8347
AB: Abstract
While the steady state is often seen as the final result of development in nature, a more realistic concept may be that nature pulses regularly to make a pulsing steady state-a new paradigm gaining acceptance in ecology and many other fields. In this paper we compare tidal salt marshes, tidal freshwater marshes, and seasonally flooded freshwater wetlands as examples of pulsed ecosystems. Despite marked differences in species composition, biodiversity, and community structure, these wetland types are functionally similar because of the common denominator of water flow pulses. Often a period of high production alternates with a period of rapid consumption in these fluctuating water-level systems, a biotic pulsing to which many life histories, such as that of the wood stork, are adapted. Pulsing of medium frequency and amplitude often provides an energy subsidy for the community thus enhancing its productivity. The energy of large-scale pulses such as storms are usually dissipated in natural ecosystems with little harm to the biotic network; however, when seawalls, dikes, or stabilized sand dunes are constructed to confront these strong pulses, the whole ecosystem (and associated human structures) may be severely damaged when the barriers fail because too much of the storm energy is concentrated on them. The relationship between biologically mediated internal pulsing, such as plant-herbivore or predator-prey cycles, and physical external pulsing is discussed not only in wetlands but in other ecosystem types as well. An intriguing hypothesis is that ecosystem performance and species survival are enhanced when external and internal pulses are coupled. We suggest that if pulsing is general, then what is sustainable in ecosystems, is a repeating oscillation that is often poised on the edge of chaos.
LA: Language
English
SL: Summary Language
English
PY: Publication Year
1995
PT: Publication Type
Book Monograph; Conference
DE: Descriptors
salt marshes; marshes; wetlands; brackishwater ecology; ecosystems; tidal effects; estuarine dynamics; biological production; physicochemical properties; environmental factors; ecosystem dynamics
ER: Environmental Regime
Marine; Brackish; Freshwater
TR: ASFA Input Center Number
CS9522927
CL: Classification
Q1 01482 Ecosystems and energetics; O 1070 Ecology/Community Studies; D 04300 Aquatic ecosystems - general
SF: Subfile
ASFA 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources; Oceanic Abstracts; Ecology Abstracts

And here's an example of the scale of Odum's vision: an energetic model of Italy:

TI: Title
Emergy use, environmental loading and sustainability. An emergy analysis of Italy
AU: Author
Ulgiati, S; Odum, HT; Bastianoni, S
AF: Author Affiliation
Dep. Chem., Univ. Siena, Pian dei Mantellini 44, 53200 Siena, Italy
SO: Source
ECOL. MODEL., vol. 73, no. 3-4, pp. 215-268, 1994
IS: ISSN
0304-3800
AB: Abstract
Maximizing emergy flow is the new statement (Odum, 1988a, 1991) of Lotks'a maximum power principle (1922a,b): self-organizing systems which maximize emergy flow and reinforce production are sustainable, the others are displaced by those with better reinforcement of their productive basis. An emergy analysis of the Italian system of economy and nature was performed in order to study its sustainability and emergy use. Indices of thermodynamic and economic vitality of Italy were evaluated and a comparison with indices of other developed and developing countries was performed.
LA: Language
English
SL: Summary Language
English
PY: Publication Year
1994
PT: Publication Type
Journal Article
DE: Descriptors
ecosystem analysis; production; economics; resource utilization; costs; Italy; sustainable development; ecosystems
CL: Classification
D 04003 Modeling, mathematics, computer applications; D 04890 Planning/development; P 9000 ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION
SF: Subfile
Ecology Abstracts; Pollution Abstracts